Despite the failure of Shaykh Said
and Azadi, Kurdish intellectuals and nationalist leaders
continued to plan for an independent Kurdistan. Many of these
nationalists met in October 1927 and not only proclaimed the
independence of Kurdistan, but also formed Khoybun
(Independence), a �supreme national organ � with full and
exclusive national and international powers�. This new
organization�s leadership believed the key to success in the
struggle for an independent Kurdistan lay not in tribal
allegiances, but in a �properly conceived, planned and
organized� military enterprise.
In displaying the need for a
proper military structure, Khoybun nominated Ihsan Nuri Pasha
Commander-In-Chief of the Kurdish National Army. Nuri Pasha,
besides being a former Kurdish member of the �Young Turk
Movement�, showed his allegiance to the Kurdish cause when he
led the mutiny within the Turkish military prior to the Shaykh
Said Revolt.
After establishing leadership,
Khoybun sought the aid of many influential European forces to
help supply the Kurdish nationalist military endeavor. Despite
their displeasure with the Kemalist regime, however, neither the
British nor the French gave much support to Khoybun. According
to Safrastian, the European powers, once supportive of Kurdish
independence, were swayed by Turkish media and press reports.
With little aid from Europe, Khoybun eventually settled for the
support of the Armenian
Dashnak Party, the Shah of Persia,
and fellow Kurds such as Shaykh Ahmad Barzani, leader of the
Iraqi Kurdistan Barzani tribe. Syrian Kurds also came to the aid
of Khoybun, cutting railroads, pillaging Turkish villages, and
conducting guerrilla assaults.
By 1928,
Ihsan Nuri Pasha had assembled a small group of soldiers
armed with modern weapons and trained in infantry tactics. This
force initiated the Khoybun revolt, marching towards Mount
Ararat. Nuri and his men not only achieved success in reaching
Mount Ararat, but they were able to secure the towns of Bitlis,
Van, and most of the countryside around Lake Van, establishing a
notable area of Kurdish resistance.
Along with their weapons,
organization, and ability, Kurdish strength was enhanced by the
positioning of the rebellion. Although Turkish forces attempted
to suppress the revolt as early as 1927, their success was
tempered by a lack of Persian cooperation, as Mount Ararat lay
in the Turkish-Persian border. By 1930, however, Turkish forces
began to take the upper hand. Beginning in May, the Turkish army
went on the offensive, surrounding Mount Ararat with over 10,000
troops by late June. Troop numbers on both sides continued to
grow as Kurdish tribes were recruited to join the cause and
approximately 60,000 more soldiers were called up by the Turkish
government.
Besides facing an increasing
numerical disadvantage, the Khoybun resistance slowly saw its
regional support disappear. Pressured by the Turkish government,
French administrators in Syria and British administrators in
Iraq restrained much of the southern support for Khoybun. Prior
to Turkish insistence, Barzani military aid from Southern
Kurdistan included 500 horsemen from the Mosul district brought
by the �Sheik of Barzan�. Other Kurdish tribal chiefs such as
Hatcho and Simqu, both from Syria, came to the aid of Khoybun in
1930.
The biggest blow to Khoybun�s
Ararat revolt, however, came from Persia. Although initially
supportive of Kurdish resistance, the Persian government did not
resist Turkish military advances into Persia to surround Mount
Ararat. Persian frontier guardsmen also began to close the
Persian-Turkish border to non-essential travelers, including
Kurdish tribes attempting to reinforce the revolt. Persia would
eventually completely submit to Turkish operational demands,
trading the land surrounding Mount Ararat for Turkish land near
Qutur and Barzirgan.
The organized revolt on Mount
Ararat was defeated by the fall of 1930, although the Turks
waited until the following spring to attack any remaining tribal
dissenters. Similar to the outcome of previous Kurdish
uprisings, the Turkish government was merciless to the rebels.
Despite the defeat,
Khoybun and the Ararat revolt are important to the history of
the peshmerga for three reasons.
First, never before had a military force been constructed
specifically for the Kurdish nationalist ideal. The influence of
the tribal shaykh as military commander was increasingly reduced
as nationalism became a more important reason for Kurdish
military actions. Second, the Khoybun revolt showed a growing
relationship between the Barzani tribe and Kurdish nationalism.
Although Mulla Mustafa Barzani had been involved in Shaykh
Mahmud�s revolt and had met with Shaykh Said, the military
support granted to the Khoybun cause from the Barzani tribe (as
led by Shaykh Ahmad and commanded by Mulla Mustafa) was
unprecedented. This level of support would continue to grow as
future peshmerga, specifically from the Barzani area, would
again be called on to defend attempted Kurdish nation-states.
Finally, the Khoybun revolt began a pattern of international
cooperation against Kurdish nationalism. Exchanges of land
between neighboring countries would be seen again as regional
powers temporarily put aside their differences in an attempt to
suppress Kurdish military ability.
The Agiri (Ağrı) Rebellion
General
Ihsan Nuri Pasha,
the leader of Kurdish guerrilla forces in this
rebellion, was from the famous Kurdish warrior
tribe Celali.
On
June 11,
1930, armed
responses to the rebellion were initiated by the
Turkish military against the Ağrı insurgents.
Xoyb�n, the Kurmanci
Kurdish nationalist
organisation co-ordinating this rebellion,
urgently appealed for help from Kurds. This was
a Kurdish rebellion by mostly Kurmanc� Kurds.
The Kurmanc� Kurds far outnumbered the Kizilbash
of Dersim. This is why, much to the Turks'
dismay, Xoyb�n's appeal was answered on a wide
front, by a counter-offensive at Tendruk, Iğdır,
Erdjish, Sipan Dagh, Van,
and Bitlis, forcing the Turks to temporarily
abandon their offensive against Ağrı. The rebels
were gradually crushed by the superior numbers
of the Turkish military.
General
Ihsan Nuri Pasha, the
commander of rebellion, has
documented the role of Turkish
Air force in defeating the Ağrı
revolt in his book titled La
R�volte de L'Agridagh (Ağrı
Dağı revolt).
By the
end of summer 1930, the Turkish Air Force was
bombing Kurdish positions around Mt. Ararat from
all directions. According to General
Ihsan Nuri Pasha,
the military superiority of Turkish Air Force
demoralized Kurds and led to their capitulation.
During
the rebellion, Turkish Air
Force bombed several Kurdish tribes and
villagers. For instance Halikanli and Herki
tribes were bombed on July 18 and August 2 1930,
respectively. Rebel villages were continually
bombed from August 2nd to 29th. From June 10th
to June 12th, 1930, Kurdish positions were
extensively bombed, and this forced the Kurds to
retreat to higher positions around Mt. Ararat.
On July 9th, Cumhuriyet
reported that the Turkish Air Force was
raining down Ararat with bombs. Kurds who
escaped the bombings, were captured alive. On
July 13th, the rebellion in Zilan was
suppressed. Squadrons of 10-15 aircraft were
used in crushing the revolt. On July 16th, two
Turkish planes were downed and their pilots were
killed by the Kurds. Aerial bombardment
continued for several days and forced Kurds to
withdraw to the height of 5,000 meters. By July
21st, bombardment had destroyed many Kurdish
forts. During these operations, Turkish military
mobilized 66,000 soldiers and 100 aircraft. The
campaign against the Kurds was over by September
17th, 1930.
The Ararat
rebellion was defeated in 1931,
and Turkey resumed control over the territory.